Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | badgods | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12772693 |
| Jeskai Control | callum bousfield | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | fabian rogatschnig | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | masahito masuda | 9-3 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | neil cruz | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | pierre marzano | 7-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | edosaggin | 8-6 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | fabioo | 8-6 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | kazuya murakami | 8-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | douglas romani | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus
Meta Performance Analysis
Torrential Gearhulk ranks #4680 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 91%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Torrential Gearhulk is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 1.70 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 6 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Torrential Gearhulk has a win rate of 56.9%, making it 18.8% better than other 6-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consider | Instant | 8 | 63.9% | 0 |
| Pull from Tomorrow | Instant | 5 | 60.5% | 0 |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 29 | 56.7% | 3 |
| Stasis Snare | Enchantment | 6 | 55.2% | 0 |
| Jwari Disruption | Instant | 10 | 54.5% | 1 |
| Aether Gust | Instant | 24 | 54.4% | 2 |
| Anger of the Gods | Sorcery | 16 | 53.9% | 1 |
| Hullbreaker Horror | Creature — Kraken Horror | 27 | 52.5% | 3 |
| Mystical Dispute | Instant | 25 | 52.1% | 1 |
| Fable of the Mirror-Breaker | Enchantment — Saga | 37 | 51.2% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Torrential Gearhulk than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consider | Instant | 1 | 6 | 73.3% | 57.3% | +16.1% |
| Aether Gust | Instant | 2 | 19 | 68.6% | 56.9% | +11.7% |
| Behold the Multiverse | Instant | 4 | 16 | 69.7% | 59.1% | +10.6% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 26 | 67.4% | 56.9% | +10.5% |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 21 | 67.0% | 57.2% | +9.8% |
| Jwari Disruption | Instant | 2 | 8 | 67.5% | 58.5% | +9.0% |
| Fable of the Mirror-Breaker | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 31 | 63.7% | 56.1% | +7.6% |
| Make Disappear | Instant | 2 | 26 | 65.7% | 58.6% | +7.1% |
| Indomitable Creativity | Sorcery | 3 | 29 | 64.2% | 57.1% | +7.1% |
| Hullbreaker Horror | Creature — Kraken Horror | 7 | 27 | 64.2% | 57.9% | +6.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 48 | 4.9% | 51.9% |
| Jeskai Control | 10 | 2.9% | 45.4% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 7 | 0.9% | 41.2% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 7 | 1.1% | 26.6% |
| Dimir Midrange | 7 | 0.3% | 13.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.